PKB, or the National Awakening Party, has recently come under fire for their controversial decision to compensate failed legislative candidates with a mere Rp15 Ribu (approximately $1) for every vote they received in the 2019 Indonesian general elections.
While it is not uncommon for political parties to offer some form of compensation to their candidates who do not make it to parliament, the amount offered by PKB has raised eyebrows and sparked widespread criticism.
The move was initially met with disbelief and outright ridicule from both the public and political commentators, who argued that such a low compensation amount not only undermined the value of the candidates’ efforts but also showed a lack of respect for the democratic process.
Critics argue that PKB’s decision highlights a worrying trend of parties prioritizing financial gain over moral values and principles. By compensating their failed candidates with such a negligible amount, PKB appears to be treating the election process as a simple transaction rather than a crucial element of a functioning democracy.
Furthermore, the paltry compensation being offered begs the question of how committed PKB is to nurturing and supporting their candidates, particularly those who may have dedicated significant time, effort, and resources to run a campaign.
It is worth noting that the Rp15 Ribu compensation offer is also significantly lower than what other parties in Indonesia have offered their failed candidates. For instance, the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) provided their unsuccessful legislative candidates with Rp200 Ribu (approximately $14) per vote they received. This stark difference in compensation amounts further emphasizes PKB’s questionable decision.
Although PKB defended their compensation scheme, arguing that it was merely a token of appreciation for the candidates’ hard work, many remain unconvinced. Critics argue that this gesture of appreciation appears shallow, insincere, and somewhat insulting.
Some suggest that this move by PKB is a sign of their financial instability or a lack of respect for aspiring politicians. Perhaps it is also indicative of a political culture that undervalues the democratic process and the efforts of those who engage in it.
The controversy surrounding PKB’s compensation scheme has sparked discussions on the need for transparency in party funding, as well as more effective regulations to ensure political parties act responsibly and ethically. It also raises questions about the standard of democracy in Indonesia and whether citizens’ rights are being adequately respected and protected.
Overall, PKB’s decision to compensate their failed candidates with only Rp15 Ribu per vote demonstrates a lack of regard for the efforts and contributions made by those who participated in the electoral process. It also sends a concerning message about the state of democracy in Indonesia, highlighting the need for greater accountability and respect for those who engage in politics.
